Bitcoin is not the king of crypto. The Internet Computer Protocol is. This is the most important idea you could possibly have in crypto today, and I'm going to lay it all out very clearly with a nice organized outline that communicates one idea. I was inspired to create this after I saw Michael Duffy 2.0 just in passing saying that, well, Bitcoin's the king of crypto. And I'm like, no, it's not. Bitcoin is not my king. ICP is. Those of us in the ICP community for the Internet Computer Protocol need to, first and foremost, stop even thinking of Bitcoin as the king. I'm going to show you exactly why here. And I'm always here for you at jerrybanfield.com in the community. I just had an awesome Zoom call with Scott, who joined for a year a couple of days ago.
Bitcoin's crown is based on the wrong metrics
Let's look at this idea that Bitcoin is the king of crypto. People are saying Bitcoin's the king because it was the first crypto, has the biggest brand, and the largest market cap. But that's no way to define a king to me. That's a king that's set up to be slain. The real king should be judged by technology, real-world use cases, global scalability, decentralization, governance, AI readiness, developer power, and the ability to build the future of the internet. By that standard, Bitcoin is not the king. It's up to each of us to stop thinking of Bitcoin like it's the king, because Bitcoin's crown is based on the most ridiculous, wrong metrics.
Would you consider this time in crypto equivalent to the internet in the 90s? Yes. The future of crypto is going to look nothing like it looks right now, just like the future of the internet looked like nothing like the very beginning of it. It's a whole new thing. There are all new companies. Companies have taken over that didn't even exist in the beginning of it.
Bitcoin is respected, and people just offhandedly say it's the king because it was first. But is AOL first? Or whoever offered the first broadband — Netscape, Navigator — are those still a thing? No. You don't get to be king forever just because you were first. Bitcoin created this idea of digital scarcity. It launched the crypto movement. It currently has the largest market cap, which to me is one of the most ridiculous ways to define being first in a crypto coin, because there are so many manipulative things you can do with a crypto coin market cap. For example, you could launch the largest market cap coin in crypto today. All you'd have to do is make 10 trillion coins and then sell one of them for $1 billion. Technically you would have the largest market cap crypto, because there are 10 trillion of them and you sold one coin for a billion. That's how ridiculous the market cap thinking is.
So Bitcoin currently has the strongest brand and this ridiculous digital gold narrative, but those aren't going to last. Being first does not mean being best. The first major player in a technology category is consistently replaced by better technology. So this does not make Bitcoin the king of crypto technology.
What should the king of crypto actually mean?
The king of crypto should be the blockchain that can answer these questions the best. And by all these definitions, the Internet Computer Protocol is very clearly the winner. The question is: what real-world problems does Bitcoin solve? What real-world problems does ICP solve? What can developers actually build on it?
For Bitcoin, the real-world problems it solves by itself: almost nothing. What can developers actually build on Bitcoin? Almost nothing. Can Bitcoin scale to global use? Absolutely not, by itself. Can it host apps and websites? Absolutely not. Can it support AI? Absolutely not. Can it reduce dependence on centralized companies? Almost not at all, barely. Can users protect themselves and participate in governance? Absolutely not. Does it create real value beyond speculation? No.
This is how I would define the king of crypto. And I encourage you to be the one who defines reality on your terms, instead of being the one who goes around taking other people's definitions without thinking about it yourself. Ask yourself: what do I think the king of crypto should be? You should be the leader of your own reality.
Bitcoin's technology is extremely limited
Bitcoin's technology is extremely limited. This is a cold, hard fact that no Bitcoin maxi would argue, although some of the BSV people get seriously delusional. Bitcoin is powerful as a monetary network, but by itself, it can't do much, and that extremely limits the value proposition. Unfortunately, I was really hyped about Bitcoin 12 years ago. I was still hyped about Bitcoin three years ago, until I saw all this stuff.
Here's what Bitcoin can't do. It can't host modern apps. It can't host websites. It can't run AI. It can't run full-stack software. It can't provide decentralized cloud infrastructure. It can't do smart contracts at any kind of scale or significance. And it can't give coin holders direct on-chain governance. That is not king material. That is an impotent, useless king. Even if you're trying to say Bitcoin's the king, it is a king where everybody's plotting against them to dethrone them.
Bitcoin almost always depends on other systems to be useful. Now, it might make sense that a human king in a kingdom would depend on their subjects. But when we're talking about a technological king, you should be able to stand on your own. Bitcoin needs a layer two for payments. It just happens that ICP has the best Bitcoin layer two, and it's the only realistic system I see that would have any trustworthiness in scaling Bitcoin out. So even if you're bullish about Bitcoin, you've got to be bullish about ICP too, because there's no better system to scale Bitcoin out to the masses.
Almost everybody holds their Bitcoin directly on an exchange. Well, technically that's not accurate, because most Bitcoin is held off exchanges, but you don't know how many of those wallets are actually active, and most of the wallets are tiny. It's a small percentage of supply. So the average person holding Bitcoin is holding it on an exchange, but the majority of Bitcoin itself is not held on exchanges. Does that make sense? The crypto normie who's holding Bitcoin is letting it sit on an exchange. Even if you want to buy crypto, you're usually going to need to go through an exchange. And even if you're not holding it on an exchange, you probably have some custodian holding it for you — which is like, why don't you just use a bank? At least if something is screwed up, a bank can go in and manually fix it for you, which may not be the case with Bitcoin.
Basically, Bitcoin can't do almost anything by itself, because it needs bridges or wrappers for any kind of DeFi. It needs other chains like ICP for any app, and it needs centralized services for user experience. If the king needs everyone else to do the work, it's not actually the king.
So ICP is the strongest coin in crypto, and that's why I say ICP is the king. It has been through the absolute most BS. It has been through the most crap out of any coin in crypto. It has gotten the most unfair treatment out of any crypto. ICP has done the most work in all of crypto and put up with the most nonsense out of any coin because of the manipulated rug pull. The team has created the best technology in the world and has gotten the least credit for doing it. And that's because it threatens everything else.
Bitcoin's decentralization story
Most people talking about Bitcoin being the king will say it's the most secure thing on earth. Well, if you consider all the third-party stuff that's built on top of it to access it, I would significantly disagree, since most people think they're transacting Bitcoin when they go on Coinbase or Binance and buy crypto. That's not transacting Bitcoin. That's on Coinbase's website and Binance's website. You're taking a leap of faith that they actually are transacting Bitcoin for you, when they can't even prove that they are. If you can withdraw it off the exchange, then you probably did, but until you get it into your own wallet, you can't even prove that anything actually happened.
But even worse than that, even directly on the Bitcoin blockchain itself, people think Bitcoin is this standard of decentralization and that it's so secure. I disagree. First off, you can easily see from your own research — go look at the Bitcoin mining pools. Mining is heavily concentrated through large pools. But even more obvious, most users don't mine or run nodes. Most individuals hold Bitcoin through exchanges, ETFs, or custodians. They don't even actually hold the keys to their own Bitcoin. And on top of that, Bitcoin holders have no say at all in the governance of the protocol. There is some tiny decentralization, and it has operated successfully with the system it has set up, but the average Bitcoin holder has almost no direct influence over the future. There's a tiny number of people — like five people on the Bitcoin Core GitHub, like five or so Bitcoin mining companies and pools who have one single person in charge. That's like 10 people who have the actual Bitcoin infrastructure that can't even do hardly anything itself without all this stuff built on top of it. These are not the properties of a technology that I would say is king of anything.
How is Bitcoin prepared for the age of AI?
Even more important going forward: how is Bitcoin prepared to be successful in an age of artificial intelligence? AI needs compute, data, identity, payments, apps, automation, fast transactions, and web services.
So how does Bitcoin's blockchain stand up in an environment where AI is building everything out? Bitcoin may be useful as money — again, if you build stuff on top of it to try to use the actual blockchain, which is then questionable, because how much of the blockchain's value is even translating into all this third-party stuff? Bitcoin can't do almost anything in the future for AI infrastructure, certainly not things like micropayments — outside of ICP, to make chain-key Bitcoin payments. Bitcoin is built for digital money, but ICP is built for the AI internet. That's the king. When your crypto is built for the AI internet — versus things like Near Protocol, or Bittensor TAO, which make me laugh, because they're a joke; they can't hardly do anything on a blockchain. ICP is built for the AI internet.
Bitcoin is absolutely losing momentum as time goes on. I think almost anybody just looking at the basics of Bitcoin charts can see that the momentum is slowing. This is not going to go up forever. And all it takes is research for people to realize that Bitcoin has become a Ponzi scheme at this point, at this valuation. It is not the king. Whoever figures out the truth about how little Bitcoin can do without everything else built on top — that's the realization. On its own, it's almost useless. It's way overvalued. It's extremely speculative. Only people thinking of it as a king based on market cap even keep it up there. Bitcoin is not very useful. It is becoming a meme coin.
Now, people have become Bitcoin millionaires, that's true. But hardly anybody was a Bitcoin millionaire in 2014, 2015, 2016. It's still very early on in ICP's history, especially with the rug pull, which Bitcoin did not have to deal with. So there are going to be a lot of ICP millionaires in the future. And this definitely is not financial advice — although with this shirt, I might look like a financial advisor.
ICP fits the real definition of a king
ICP fits the real definition of a king. To me, this is what a king of crypto should be able to do. A king should be able to host software directly on chain. No other crypto can do that. If you're going to say you're the king of crypto, you should be able to do stuff that's important — not some dumb thing that's not important, like, oh, we can shove a directed acyclic graph over there, look at this tiny useless thing we can do that nobody else can do. No. You should be able to do something that's really important that nobody else can do.
Do you think anybody's trying to use AI right now to reverse engineer Bitcoin, Ethereum, or any of these other coins? No. Are they trying to use AI to reverse engineer ICP? Yes. That's the king. People are trying to figure out how the king works. You're not doing that with these other ones.
ICP can host software directly on chain and serve web front ends as proof. You can go to jerrybanfield.com, which is a website you should be on every day reading. Everybody's like, who's going to be on jerrybanfield.com every day? Well, I've got a blog. I have entire books — like 10 different books — all published on my blog. I've put all this on ICP, 800 posts and counting, directly on the ICP blockchain, which no other blockchain could do. No other blockchain could even do anything close to this. I built an entire website, 100 PageSpeed score, fully indexed on Google, all of it fully on chain, all of it built directly using Claude, taking my own videos and books and putting them on there. You could literally read probably for two or three hundred hours on jerrybanfield.com, and I just put this up in the last two weeks from my existing videos. If you want some deeper archives of my content, it's on there. This will be a permanent archive that can't get taken down, censored, or banned, so that I have guaranteed control over my brand. This is what the king can do. The king can build an entire website fully on chain and do something genuinely useful, like solve a real, huge problem for my business. It can run all the backend logic to support that. It can store applications, host decentralized apps, support smart contracts, integrate with Bitcoin, and use chain-key technology, being the best Bitcoin layer two and the best Ethereum layer two.
A true king has on-chain governance
And here's a big one: the king should have on-chain governance, because to me, a true king is one who listens to their people. Like Nelson Mandela in his book Long Walk to Freedom talked about the ancient African kings. Do you know how they governed? There were obviously different African kings and they governed differently, but the ones Nelson Mandela talked about governed through love, respect, listening, and understanding of the people. The king would have all the people come to his court, and every single person would have a chance to talk and share their opinion. Everyone. It was all men, but the women would influence the men; they had their role, they did their thing, they were important. The men would all show up together. Every man would speak, and the king would sit there and listen to every single man. Then the king would try to put it together and say, at the end of what every man said, okay, so you all basically said this, this, and that. And from there, it'd be up to all the rest of the people to see if they agreed with the king or not. If they didn't agree with the king, they would all adjourn and start over again another day.
The king's job was to take in the will of the people and to manifest it. All the desires of the women were expressed to the men. It was the man's job to know the desires of his woman and then express those to the king. It was the king's job to listen to all the men, who would listen to all the women. And it was the king's job to bring all of that into very clear action. The king was a genius who took in huge amounts of data and simplified it so that everyone could be as happy as possible. That's what ICP does. It solves all these huge problems with one single simple solution — a traditional king who is able to serve the people. Because if you don't have on-chain governance like ICP does, you aren't the king, because you're not listening to the community.
On ICP, you can go into the network nervous system, and any person who has even one ICP — which is just a couple of dollars — can go in and vote on exactly what's happening. You can view proposals. These are proposals you can go and vote on, right inside my actual wallet. If you don't have on-chain governance, you can't do that. You can go in, vote, and participate with your governance, and these are how you earn rewards. So, for example, I'll vote yes on a proposal: click yes, vote with all my neurons, and all my followers will vote. I have then participated in the governance on the Internet Computer Protocol. That's a true king — when every single man, woman, and child with at least just $2 of ICP can go in and have their say. And what I love about DFINITY is that DFINITY actually listens to the community on big decisions and lets the community use the on-chain governance to vote, and makes their decisions off of that. That, to me, is a true king. Bitcoin, you can't do that. You can dig into a lot more of this on my ICP Crypto playlist.
If Ethereum goes back to its all-time high, don't worry about any of these other coins. ICP is the king. None of the other coins matter; don't even think about them. It's just like if you're married — you don't need to be thinking about other women. Same thing in crypto: if you're married to the king, you don't need to think about anybody else.
ICP makes Bitcoin more useful
Even better, ICP makes Bitcoin more useful. ICP does not need to ruin and annihilate Bitcoin. The only way I see Bitcoin successfully going forward right now is through the integration with chain-key Bitcoin. Through that, Bitcoin can become more programmable, more usable, integrated with smart contracts, useful in DeFi and across applications, and secure. So the best version of Bitcoin may live on ICP. If Bitcoin even wants to stay the theoretical king of crypto, it's going to depend on the technological crypto king to take it there.
I got a little ahead of myself and already demonstrated the network nervous system, showing how you can stake, vote, and participate in governance. If you want help with that, you can schedule a call. A lot of the calls I have are with people who have ICP and want to get off Coinbase, who want to participate in the governance and want help. You can either join the Jerry Banfield Family and get that first call included, or you can book a Zoom call outright. You can also DM me. If you have questions about ICP, want to share them, or want to post screenshots, you can get help in my community.
The "rug pull" story is mind control
Let's wrap up this idea of ICP being a rug, and somehow that being held against it. That is the propaganda, the manipulation, the mind control. Somehow you think that because crypto exchanges listed the Internet Computer Protocol ridiculously high — like 20-plus times higher than it should have been listed — and then it naturally crashed because that was crazy, that's all there is to know about it: that it's a rug pull. You have been a victim of mind control. You've been a victim of being intentionally misled. And when you realize, oops, I fell for the propaganda — I remember reading historical fiction books where you'd hear people listening to the state radio, like from the Soviet Union or the Third Reich.
You'd be like, how can any of these people believe this propaganda they're being fed? And it's the same thing when you see people looking at ICP today and saying, oh, it's just a rug pull. Okay, well, you're in crypto. If you're going to just believe authority and take in all the propaganda, why are you in crypto? Back in the day in 2014, we did not get into crypto to be a part of the propaganda. We got into crypto for a system that gives us a chance to get outside of that. So please, if you think ICP is just a rug pull, to me you are just in the propaganda trap. You've been fed the story you're supposed to buy into, the one that will disempower you and stop you from seeing the true king. Because once you see the true king, the rest of crypto is useless. All the false kings, all the false idols, all the false gods in crypto are desperate for you not to know who the true king is. Because the true king gives token holders direct governance. Nothing else in crypto does that — fully on-chain voting, where the wallet, the voting, and the entire process are all completely on chain. No other crypto does that, and that is essential for any real decentralization, any real infrastructure.
This is the thing: ICP is the king because it's infrastructure. It's not just a Ponzi scheme trying to go up in price. ICP is not just trying to be money. In my opinion, it's going to be the absolute number one financial instrument in the world: the infrastructure for websites, apps, AI, smart contracts, decentralized hosting, Bitcoin, chain-key assets, digital identity, tamper-proof services, and full-stack Web3. When you build all that in one environment that's secure and tamper-proof, it helps stop cybercrime, which is one of the biggest problems in the world today. And then it just happens that, well, if we already have all this stuff built on ICP, then taking payments is super easy. Behind that, if you get governments like Pakistan and Switzerland moving their infrastructure online, they will have built-in ICP payments. Do you understand that? That's the money king — not Bitcoin. When you've got your website built on ICP, taking ICP payments is super easy. And when you have people already with ICP internet identities through Internet Identity, which is now as simple as using your Google or Apple account to sign in, then money is all built into it. All Bitcoin has going for it is this idea as a money asset.
ICP is not just a money or a crypto or a coin like all the rest of these are. ICP is an entire blockchain cloud app platform and AI-ready internet infrastructure that other people are desperate to reverse engineer — but it's unlikely they're going to be able to do it, because ICP already has first-mover advantage. They've already got governments onboarding. They already have all the infrastructure set up. And nobody's trying to reverse engineer Bitcoin at this point. For decades, people have tried to reverse engineer Bitcoin. They've created their own versions. They've literally copied the blockchain, and none of them is as valuable as Bitcoin. ICP is first mover in the most important category in the world right now, which is secure computation — AI-protected and safe, both protected from AI hacks and safe to run AI and use for AI. ICP is a secure cloud computing platform that's decentralized, worldwide, transparent, and has a monetary instrument and governance built in. This is the most important technology in the world, and it is flying under the radar because it's supposed to fly under the radar. You're not supposed to know about it yet, because once you know about it, the opportunity is gone. It needs to be prepared and gotten ready more.
If Bitcoin and ICP were companies
So let's treat Bitcoin and ICP as if they were companies. How would you compare them? How would you appraise them? This is what you need to be able to do in crypto. If ICP and Bitcoin were companies, how would you compare them? Bitcoin has a massive brand — that's true. It does have a huge market cap. But again, for crypto, is market cap the most appropriate way to judge a coin? The existing entities that have power in crypto, like crypto exchanges, do want you to look at market caps and prices, because that's how they profit. They do not want you to look at technology, because there's almost no money they can make off you when you look at technology — and not market cap, branding, narratives, simple products, and limited functionality.
So Bitcoin has the old version of crypto, the dial-up internet version of crypto, locked down. That's true. But in the future we're going toward, ICP is the king of the future of crypto. So I'll respect that Bitcoin was the king of the past in crypto. But there's the new direction the future is going, and there's the old crypto. Bitcoin was the king of old crypto — just get your marketing out, make a huge brand, have narratives and a simple product and limited functionality. That's old crypto. New crypto is: do you have a business model? Do you do something actually useful to people outside of crypto? Is there something more to your coin than just price-go-up?
ICP has a huge product surface area. I showed you my website earlier. I can't do that on Bitcoin or any other crypto. This is real utility, real products, real problems — just as a web host, even in the simplest, easiest-to-understand way. ICP has the absolute best web hosting infrastructure in the entire world. Is that sinking in? ICP has the best web hosting infrastructure I've ever seen, and I've looked at AWS, Google Cloud, and WordPress. ICP is vastly superior because it has a coin attached to it, because it's on a blockchain. The technical capability of it is so far ahead of everything else in crypto that other cryptos are giving up. They are literally quitting even trying to innovate. Before ICP was around, people were trying to innovate these foundations. Now, as quietly as they can — and some of them publicly — they're giving up. They see they have no future. They are finished. A lot of them don't even have roadmaps anymore. They're not even trying to make anything, because ICP is the king of crypto in the future. It has all the technical capability, all the product surface area, all the real-world use cases, vastly superior options.
ICP is the only crypto I can easily be a developer on, and the only one where I can actually use the product without anyone ever knowing it has anything to do with crypto. When you go to jerrybanfield.com, is there any indication — besides me talking about crypto — that it's hosted on a blockchain? And yet every time you go to my website, you are creating a transaction directly on the ICP blockchain, asking the blockchain for my website, and then it sends you my website. I could only build that on ICP. That's why ICP already has the biggest AI relevance, because it's the place you can use AI to build almost anything securely with built-in payments, and it's easy to plug in third-party stuff if you want to. ICP is also the best solution we can see right now to host the future of the internet.
So a serious appraisal of Bitcoin, of ICP, and of all the other cryptos wouldn't ask which one's the biggest market cap and crown a king based on that. It would ask: what does this actually produce? Tell me the business model for this. Bitcoin obviously is the king of crypto history. But the future, baby, the future — ICP is the king of the future of crypto. That's why you have coins, like I talked about with Sui, literally pretending like they're ICP. The co-founder of Sui, seven months ago, is trying to act like his blockchain does anything close to what ICP does. The founder of Sui sees where we're going in crypto, and he can see ICP is where the future's headed. Since they see the truth of where the future's headed, they're acting like they're going there too. Imagine if I was selling vacations and I actually wasn't going there. Imagine I sold you on all these vacations and said I was going to lead you there, but then somebody else next door actually took all the people on the trip, and I was like, thanks for your money, but I was never planning on going there anyway. That's the rest of crypto. Everything else in crypto is all disappointments and just people saying anything they can to get money out of you. ICP is the king of the truth.
Michael Duffy — I watched his video this morning and he inspired me. He did a great ICP video. He clipped me, Bobby Oh, and Dominic Williams in it. And he inspired me, because I'm like, I need to get Michael Duffy off the idea that Bitcoin is the king of crypto. It's not. ICP is the king of crypto. Bitcoin at best is the king of old crypto. ICP is the king of new crypto. The one thing that differentiates me from a lot of people is I think about where we're going from here. I don't spend much time looking at where we've been.
Won't ICP trend further down with the market and Bitcoin, but only later go to astronomical numbers? Here's the thing: with ICP, you don't need to worry about the day-to-day price or the short-term price action. What you need to look at is, is this in position to dominate over the next decade? If the answer is yes, then for me, I'm trying to buy as much as I can before other people know about this. I don't pay much attention to short-term markets or prices. Every month I look at it and I'm like, do I want to buy more ICP? This month I bought 995 more ICP, even though I had to take a credit card cash advance at 12% APR to buy it.
Why now is the time to accumulate
I share my own positioning here as my conviction and my research, not as financial advice or a recommendation for what you should buy — those are your own decisions. In most scenarios, my view is that ICP goes up at least double, if not 10-plus times what it is now. So I'll pay 12% APR happily, because my expected return would be at least 5X at an absolute minimum if I was desperate and ran out of other money to pay my rent. If I can afford to hold onto it longer, which I certainly hope, then my expected return may be 10, 20, 30, 50, or 100X from what I bought it at today. Every month I'm like, do I want to buy some ICP this month? If the price is toward all-time lows, yes. So it doesn't really matter to me what happens in the short term. The lower it goes, the more I'm going to buy. What I'm not going to do is stack ICP up, especially over $5, when you can buy ICP at $2. I know psychologically I'm not going to be able to buy any more once it gets up over like $5. So I'm stacking up. This is the king, and I'm stacking right now.
At what price am I selling a few ICP? That depends on when I need to pay my rent. If some of these business systems I'm building bring in more Zoom calls and more Family members, then I hopefully won't have to sell any ICP until it's $100. I would love to not sell any of my ICP until it's at least $100, because I'm looking at a 50-plus X on all the ICP I bought. Now, if your boy gets desperate and I can't make any of these business models work, then I may need to sell some to pay rent and avoid bankruptcy — but that should not happen, hopefully, for anywhere from four to six months even if things go poorly in the rest of my life. So I have no intention of selling any ICP anytime before like $100, if I can bring in enough revenue. If my revenue isn't that great and the price shoots to 20 within the next three or four months, I might unload a couple thousand ICP, so I could take 40 grand and pay down some debt and make sure I can stay in the spot I'm in.
To me, the ideal exit point would start at $100, because one of the worst things you can do is sell early. You'd think you'd feel worse losing money, but I feel worse selling early. Imagine being in on ICP, you buy it at $2 and $5 and $10 and $12, and then you start selling at $15, and it goes to $500. I've done that with Dash. It makes all the money you made seem worthless, and you just go around feeling like an idiot for years. So to me, the worst-case scenario is to sell the king early.
This is like the ultimate fair-launch coin at this point — you're getting it cheaper than the VCs bought it, in a sense we're the new VC investors. There's a lot of evidence that ICP is the king. I believe there are a lot of scenarios where ICP hits a $1 trillion market cap, and that's a thousand X from now. When that will be, how long it will last, or how much volatility there will be along the way — those are all unknowns. I'd say there's probably a 50 to 60% probability that ICP hits a trillion-dollar market cap one day, which is a thousand X from today, June 27, 2026. That's why I have 3,000 ICP locked indefinitely. I will not be missing that top. And I'm trying to load up as much more as I can, liquid and short-term staked, while compounding the maturity in my long-term stake. Again, this is my own conviction and not financial advice for you.
The whole thought is: you pay off your debt and go back into debt. Here's what's really cool with ICP. Let's say the price pumps to $20 or $30. What I may do is take my ICP, send it over to something like Liquidium, and take a loan out against it. If the ICP price crashes, I don't have to repay the loan — I just lose my ICP. If the ICP price pumps like crazy, I could actually increase my loan and get even more money. That's why I'm taking credit card cash advances right now to buy more ICP, because the few thousand dollars of ICP I bought, I might be able to send over to Liquidium in a few months and get a loan for 10 or 20 thousand dollars against that same ICP that I bought for a couple thousand. My goal is to be the realest crypto YouTuber out there.
Are you tired of these crappy coins? Me too. Although the future of crappy coins will also be on ICP. What's going to happen, in my view, is that once the rest of the blockchains, the other layer ones, realize the game's up, everybody's just going to move onto ICP and launch a zillion crap coins on ICP. So yes, that'll shoot the ICP price up, but there'll be a zillion crap coins and SNS projects all hosted on ICP in the future. We're not getting out of crap coins; they'll just be on ICP instead of all these other junk chains. The same realization I went through here is the one any honest Bitcoin maxi eventually hits, which is what I get into in when Michael Saylor discovers ICP is better than Bitcoin.
Thanks for watching. I really appreciate each of you. Remember, anytime you want to ask questions about anything, you can schedule a call or join the Jerry Banfield Family. Have a great day.